英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字,中文词皆可:


请选择你想看的字典辞典:
单词字典翻译
sterilized查看 sterilized 在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
sterilized查看 sterilized 在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
sterilized查看 sterilized 在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕





安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Is Psychology Today a credible source?
    So in that sense, Psych Today might bring up a topic that the wider public finds interesting, and that perhaps we can provide a more scientific answer to I agree with these points when seeing a question using Psychology Today as a reference, but I have trouble accepting answers purely based on Psychology Today articles For answers
  • 国际上有哪些权威的心理学类期刊? - 知乎
    2 Journal of Applied Psychology (Article Influence Score: 3 916) 3 Personnel Psychology (Article Influence Score: 3 362) 4 Organizational Research Methods (Article Influence Score: 3 055) 5 Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (Article Influence Score: 2 487) 6 Journal of Organizational Behavior (Article Influence Score: 2
  • 求推荐心理学专业的外文期刊吗? - 知乎
    《Professional psychology, research and practice》 (专业心理学,研究及实践)【美】 10 《British journal of psychology》(英国心理学杂志)【英】 11 《American journal of psychology》(美国心理学杂志)【美】 12 《Scandinavian journal of psychology》 (斯堪的纳维亚心理学杂志)【英】 13
  • Are we to accept only Wikipedia links in answers? - Psychology . . .
    Personally, I agree, and if we accepted Wikipedia generally, is that going to lead to Psychology Today being acceptable in a general sense? What is the consensus? For a balanced view, see Is Wikipedia a reliable source? on Medical Sciences SE; Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed? on Academia SE; Reliability of Wikipedia on
  • Should we edit plagiarism or delete it? - Psychology Neuroscience . . .
    What sparked this is a Psychology amp; Neuroscience answer which is purely a cut and paste answer from Psychology Today, I flagged to the moderators for further action The person who posted this
  • What are reliable sources? - Psychology Neuroscience Meta Stack Exchange
    One concern is that if we accept Wikipedia for non-professional questions, then what about other resources: TED talks, random blogs, magazines, Psychology Today? Read more: Is Wikipedia a reliable source? on Medical Sciences SE; Are there instances where citing Wikipedia is allowed? on Academia SE; Reliability of Wikipedia on Wikipedia
  • Name change of CogSci - what about Psychology?
    The [pending] site's name [change] has been on my mind for quite a while I may be off here, but my preference now (I voted for Mind amp; Brain earlier in some lost meta post) is: Psychology Bef
  • User Chris Rogers - Psychology Neuroscience Meta Stack Exchange
    Q A about the site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry
  • Newest moderation Questions - Psychology Neuroscience Meta Stack . . .
    Q A about the site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry
  • Recently Active Questions - Page 3 - Psychology Neuroscience Meta . . .
    Q A about the site for practitioners, researchers, and students in cognitive science, psychology, neuroscience, and psychiatry





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009