英文字典,中文字典,查询,解释,review.php


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       


安装中文字典英文字典辞典工具!

安装中文字典英文字典辞典工具!










  • licensing - Can I use a Apache v2 licensed driver for a commercial . . .
    The only obligations you have when redistributing the binaries of an Apache-licensed project are detailed in Section 4, subsection a, b, and d: a You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License; and b You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files; and
  • How to comply with Apache 2. 0 license? - Open Source Stack Exchange
    LICENSE or COPYING file is needed to explicitly state the license, only if your software is an open source software The initial creation of a NOTICE file is not mandatory according to the language of section 4(d) of the Apache License v2 0
  • Apache v2 - How to properly fulfill the license in a product
    Apache v2 specifies on point 4a: You must give any other recipients of the Work or Derivative Works a copy of this License If one uses an Apache v2 library in a commercial product must one deliver the Apache license text together with the product? (if the product can't display the text)
  • licensing - How can I correctly apply the Apache 2. 0 licence to . . .
    Adding the copyright line is one way to fulfill the Apache 2 0 license requirement of adding a notice to the files that you changed them Most changes to, and especially removal of, copyright lines are not-done, because it can be seen as misappropriation of the code or misrepresentation of who created the code which is prohibited by most
  • Can I fork and sell a modified Apache 2. 0 licensed project?
    There is a nice Apache 2 0-licensed project that already implements the foundation of a way more elaborate product that I intend to sell as proprietary Something like the 70% of the code will be modified or rewritten, so it's not really like I'm including it as a module or library
  • licensing - What are the practical differences between MIT, Apache and . . .
    The Apache 2 0 license requires you to keep the license file, the NOTICE file if there is one, and show notice for modified files It also addresses some patent-related issues, so companies use it a lot It is compatible with GPLv3 but not v2 (due to the patent clauses) There is also an old BSD license that has an clause related to advertising
  • Apache 2. 0 license - Open Source Stack Exchange
    I have a question about the NOTICE and CHANGELOG files in Apache 2 0 license Here is the situation: I based my work on an Apache 2 0 licensed project I did some minor changes (compared to the original work) It seems that I have two problems: According to the Apache 2 0 license, I have to include NOTICE file if it was in the original work
  • Requirements for using an Apache-licensed library
    I now read the other question tagged apache-2 0, but what I do not understand about this license are the following points: 1 The license says that I have to include a copy of the license in the project when I used an Apache-licensed library If the library already contains the license, do I still have to copy and include it into my project file?


















中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009