英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
insulates查看　insulates　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
insulates查看　insulates　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
insulates查看　insulates　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Which is grammatically correct? Open or opens?
    The second one is correct In The quest opens up doors the verb opens up agrees in person and number with the subject quest The sentence doesn't require are if both the prepositional phrase of finding methods of expression and the restrictive relative clause that is authentic to oneself refer to the noun quest The meaning of the sentence is that that quest which consists of finding methods
  • phrase requests - More professional word for day to day task . . .
    I’m looking for a more professional term or phrase to describe “day to day task” or a task that is very common for a particular role of work
  • “provide X to someone” vs “provide X for someone”
    One can provide [basically] any X to Y However, "provide food for their young" means specifically: care for them by giving them food We even have an idiom based on that: This provides food for thought Parents provide for their children To provide for=to sustain or support physically or financially or in some other way that does not just mean to give or supply whereas: provide x to y just
  • Why it is vs Why is it - English Language Usage Stack Exchange
    What is the difference between these two sentences: 1 ) Please tell me why is it like that (should I put question mark at the end) 2 ) Please tell me why it is like that (should I put question
  • Regarding Re: ; what is the correct usage in an email subject line?
    I want to know what is the recommended way to use Re: in the subject line of an email I use Re: in the subject line as a shortform of 'in regards to' Whenever I have used Re:, people have told me
  • verbs - Lets vs. lets: which is correct? - English Language . . .
    Let’s is the English cohortative word, meaning “let us” in an exhortation of the group including the speaker to do something Lets is the third person singular present tense form of the verb let meaning to permit or allow In the questioner’s examples, the sentence means to say “Product (allows permits you to) do something awesome”, so the form with lets is correct
  • word choice - Congratulation vs. congratulations - English Language . . .
    Congratulations is simply the plural form of congratulation See these examples from the Merriam-Webster dictionary: Let me offer you my congratulations for being elected Please send her my congratulations I sent her a letter of congratulations The plural form illustrated by the examples above is much more used than the singular form: 2523 matches for congratulations vs 56 matches for
  • punctuation - Should I use a comma before and or or? - English . . .
    Is using a comma then an "and" or an "or" after it proper punctuation? Example: I fell over, and hurt my knee Should I go, or not?
  • vocabulary - Word to describe everyday things - English Language . . .
    Is there any one word which can describe everyday things? By this, I mean things we commonly regard as things most people do every day, like taking a shower, brushing your teeth, getting dressed,
  • grammaticality - Is Thanks a ton a commonly used phrase? - English . . .
    The commonly used expression, in AmE, is thanks a million I think thanks a ton has derived from the same expression and eventually found its way to the mainstream I can't find anything for thanks a ton in NOAD, but see an entry for thanks a million Furthermore, I can't find the same expression registered in OED, which makes it chiefly American





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009